Something of the work in theological study has been a gestation period for me, a maturation of Christ in me, and I in Him. Theological study has been to begin seeing my own immaturity. Frankly, it is there with me as I am reading and writing. It is in the ways my mind is racing to argue with an author before I have let them have their say, or inversely in the unthinking acceptance of every statement on every page. It is with me in the silly, inefficient, and ineffective construction of an argument. This exposure of my own immaturity, and the requirement to persist anyway, is developing within me not only a grace with myself, but with others as well. In continuing the work, I am learning to be patient and trust God. But of course this does not mean that our immaturity — my immaturity — is inconsequential. God is not leaving my neighbors to suffer with it. It simply means that lately, when I am brought to consider my immaturity, I am also brought to remember the sweetness of God’s care my whole life. “Jesus” is one of the earliest names I learned. My family read the Scriptures. We went to church. My parents led worship. One of the earliest songs I wrote was at the age of five. It was a sincere little tune about my love for Jesus. In keeping with my upbringing, I have continued to seek the Lord that I might grow in Him, which is to say that I have continued to be sought by Him that He might grow in me.
Along that winding path of maturation, one memory that has returned to me is a thought about Scripture that emerged when I was quite young, a thought that I would now call inappropriate. I was a young teenager when a man from the congregation, somewhere in his late twenties, took me under his wing and began teaching me drums. In between lessons we would talk about the church, the Bible, God, etc. Observing him as he interacted with others, I noticed his use of the Scriptures as a tool, a weapon of sorts, in arguments with other Christians. I remember a peculiar, slow-crawling feeling that this was an appealing reason to learn the Bible more. What a simply seductive little tomb to seal away the light. And it would be embarrassing to admit all of that here and now, but a better thought has helped roll that stone away (particularly through my theological education) that God is at work in me precisely in my weakness. And while I may not be ready to stand alongside Paul boasting in it, certainly I find a grace in confession: the Scriptures are not for my use in making a name for myself. It is my sense now that true theological development (and there is clearly false) should lead us to utter humility of speech, faithful care of our neighbors, tearful longing for the goodness God intends for all things, and an abiding joy in suffering. None of these are found in the use of Scripture as a tool for social dominance, nor the malignant theologies that arise from such use.
Along with maturation, just as infants become toddlers, comes the learning of speech. Theological study has been a way of prayer, a conversation with the saints and with God about who He is, who I am, who my neighbor is, etc. And once any answer comes, say that I and my neighbor are mutually “images of God”, then another question emerges, and another, and so on. Who is the God we are images of? What is the relationship between any and all of us, and why? As each question unfolds, a myriad of insufficient answers can, and almost invariably do, present themselves. The trouble is that often, at least at very first, they satisfy. And so we bring them to speech, sing them in our songs, use them in sermons, in cliches and the like. The process of maturing in God however goads us such that these insufficient answers become less and less appetizing on our tongues, urging us deeper into both dissatisfaction and surprise. This, I think, is what is happening in each of us as the Spirit brings us to speak in new tongues, or brings us to holy silence.
What then is the relationship of theological study and the call of ministry for me? One of the difficulties in this question lies in the fact that I do not have a specific sense of what I am called to do. I perhaps used to, but not anymore. Occasionally others call upon me to teach or lead within the church in some capacity, but I am hardly a “minister” in the vocational sense. Yet even still there remains a sense of “calling.” A calling to what, I still do not know. Nevertheless, I’ll attempt an answer here, however insufficient or unsatisfying.
First the question implies an answer. The question is not about the relationship of theology and ministry but the study of it. The study of theology is in itself both a means and an end precisely because of who it is we are studying. Bonhoeffer tells us that this question, the study of “who” God is, is the question of everything because it brings us to the end of ourselves as we are creatures held in the hands of our Creator. “It is only with reference to God that human beings know who they are.” But is also the end of ourselves by another meaning in that the One we are asking about is our end, our telos, our future. The study of theology is to study what it means to be who we are, to become ourselves with God and others in His will for us. But none of this should lead us to believe that the project is entirely a journey of exploring the question of “who” alone. The revelation that God brings is that “who” we are is nothing short of a calling to do something, to be something in our doing of it. This is how we come to know God: in God’s work in us and for us, joined to His work in and for all. Thus, as Chris Green tells us, “who we are comes to be known only in our doing of what it is we are called to do.” We are the children of God as we walk in the light. And it means to do this work because of who it is that is working in us, faithful as He is to complete it. God brings us to our end, both our judgement and our fullness, our completion, and He does so in joining us to work alongside Him in joy. The inherent discipline within theological study then is to be a disciplined one, a disciple. It is to be brought into the hard work of our vocation, to study so that we become who we are to do what we are to do.
Doing the work of ministry then is to fulfill our human calling in a particular way, a way that separates us from the life we would live without deep attentiveness to what God wants for us and our neighbors. Like Gideon’s men separated at the river’s edge by how they drew water to their lips, ministry is attending to what is right under our noses yet always with our eyes up, alert to signs of the wind of the Spirit which “blows wherever it wills”. We are, as Green reminds us, “singled out by God to share in the work of making room,” that our vocation is “always only on behalf of others — never instead of them, much less against them.” We are to be for others the way God is for us, to be people carried along by the wind of the Spirit. Theological study reminds us that our attention can easily be swept to programs and pragmatics, but that our first and last attention should be upon the One who is searching the hidden things in us and for the ones ones hidden from us. Thus our attention is drawn first to consider God, who is for us as we will be for others, and then to follow his line of sight to those to whom He is sending us. Ministry is both a calling and a sending.
What then does ministry, as essentially the calling and sending of human beings, have to do with the Church? For myself, at least in part, I will have to answer with the most captivating and mystical experience of the Eucharist I have ever had. Without laboring through every detail here, I will just say that in a particularly dark time, when I knew only despair in any given moment, the Spirit served me the bread and the wine in an unforgettable and undeniable way. Two things that remain with me about that day: 1) That my reception of it in the Church prepared me for my reception of it spiritually that day, and 2) My heart, which had been too distressed to carry any needs of others, was lifted to join the Spirit in interceding for those who were in need. And so I might say that the Eucharist strengthened me so as to burden me that I could bear my neighbors’ needs to the Lord in prayer again. Or to say it another way, while I was yet being consumed from within, Christ’s meal came to consume me so that I might be filled anew. And yet another way, I was met in my despair with joy so that I could agonize with God over the harm coming to others. All of this to suggest that it is to the Table and to fellowship that I have been called to serve, but also that it is theological study that has helped me to contemplate what that moment might be for me.
By now I have tried to say (what others have said more poignantly) that the study of God is an attentiveness to a calling which is human, communal and burdened. It likely cannot be clearer that it means that I am called to the Church, as difficult and painful as that calling has been thus far. However, I can say that through my theological study something has changed about the way I engage the Church. It is as if all along there have been shadowed versions of the good at work in me, and only now can I begin to see them. Much like the blind man in Mark 8 who is led by the hand and touched by Jesus so as to see “men as trees, walking” I am in need of his hand leading me to see more clearly. Even still, now instead of listening to every sermon with a critical ear, I find within me an eagerness to hear the goodness of God spoken well. Instead of anxiety about who I am and where my place is among the other staff or laity, I find a peace in welcoming and befriending the easy to overlook among us. In other words, theological study has made a peace within possible so that I can be about the work of peacemaking, or at the very least to be a less chaotic presence. There is at the same time both a greater assurance and a greater humility about perspectives I hold, or rather perspectives which have a hold of me.
And yet there are ideas, and the harmfulness which arises from them, that need to be thwarted. It is just as false to ministry to bring our insecurities dissonantly to the forefront of Church community as much as it is to only ever harmonize dissonances. The writer of Hebrews encourages to “lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us”. If theological study has had any relationship to ministry for me it has been to show that even when we are talking and teaching others about sin, if not especially then, we are vulnerable to the snares. The ease with which we are ensnared lies precisely in our zeal to hunt it down and route it out rather than turning our efforts toward freeing those who are caught and wounded in its trappings. We are easily ensnared because we are bedazzled by oncoming lights, as “Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:14). Theological study, then, is a narrowing of our perceiving as much as it is a broadening. It is meant to draw us to discernment, to focus, to see what is truly happening beneath whatever may seem to be. Of course there are those who do not know the Name we are trying to make, but it is also true that there are ways those, who know the Name, use it for whatever they can make from it. Again, this can seem satisfying to us, appealing to even our good desires for God to be at work in us and through us. And much worse, because we already believe that our success in using the Name for our ends is a sign that God is in our misuse, when God comes truly to do his work, He will have to work against what we have done in His Name, and just so, we will fervently resist Him. Theological study prompts us not only to desire God, but to see how even our godly desires can often be bent against us, against God, and against the good of our neighbors. So then when our ministering is self-appeasing and successful, we are pressed to look more deeply, to aim instead for faithfulness rather than success, and to depend on God and neighbor to discern the Light from the lights.
And so, while I do not know precisely what I am called to do in ministry, this is perhaps why I feel drawn to study theology now —because it is not useful to me. I am not able to apply it to make a life for myself that is profitable or successful. And because I am not able to lay hold of it, it is only able to lay hold of me. It questions me and asks if it is truly Christ’s life that has hold of my imagination, especially as successes may come their way. It prompts me to pause before I speak to my neighbors who suffer illness to consider if anything I might say would help them to hear the word God is speaking, and then to speak only after silence and prayer to God so that any speech or silence might be filled with the Spirit’s voice. I am studying theology because it is the way God is making me myself, more human, more priestly, more neighborly, more patient. It is a way God is filling me with His roominess for others in humility. It is drawing me to the suffering of others for their care and for their justice. It is producing a painful hope for God’s beauty to be made known through my life as it is joined to His. It is the way God is knitting me together in his womb, nursing me at his breast, and birthing me anew.